「反身性聲語場景」以感官民族誌中強調「多重感官」（multisensory）、「具身體現、具地」（embodied, emplaced）、「反身性」（reflexivity）以及「實踐中認知」（knowing in practice）等思考作為知識建構的方法論，生產涉及身體感官、歷史旁白、閾限主體、記憶聲響、口傳敘事等命題的反思實踐行動。這些具身實踐將以地方作為事件，透過聲語敘事的物質性、觸視覺文本、媒體物件等檔案，開展出民族誌書寫中以「文字」作為主要表達的他種可能性，近一步探問空間場所如何影響了身份政治？主體話語如何透過場所聲響建構自身的主體性？當國家戰爭干預個人生命、並構造成為知識論中的「他者」時，感官民族誌所倡議的田野複性感知如何在異質空間中敞開域外的身體書寫？如何透過場所話語的考掘、將身體的具地行動轉譯為聲景書寫？如何讓觀者、地方民眾透過藝術實踐進入反身性思考自身與歷史、考掘自身與世界的文化關係？是此研究重要的問題意識。對此問題意識一連串的行動回應，亦是探究歷史空間、地方事件的身體回音。

This study utilizes sensory ethnography to emphasize the thinking of ‘multisensory‘, ‘embodied‘, ‘emplaced‘, ‘reflexivity‘ and ‘knowing in practice‘ as the core methodology of knowledge construction. The production involves reflective practices such as physical senses, historical narration, threshold subjects, memory sounds, and oral narratives. These embodied practices take places as ‘event’ to explore the possibilities of using “words” as the main form of expression in the writing of ethnography, and to further explore how spaces and places affect identity politics. How does the subject discourse construct its own subjectivity through the sounds of places? The national war intervenes with life politics, constructing the concept ‘others‘ in the theory of knowledge. How does the field revival perception advocated by sensory ethnography open its body to writing outside its domain in a heterogeneous space? How does one translate the field experience of the body into the ‘Technology of Self‘ of spatial sounds? Through artistic practice, how does one let viewers and local people delve into reflexive thinking about the cultural relationship between itself and history, itself and the world? These are the important issues of consciousness in this research. This series of actions and responses to these issues of consciousness are also the body echoes of historical space and local events.

━━━━━━━━━ 林欣怡． ICCS 衝突、正義、解殖：亞際社會批判研究 子計畫V